SUPPLEMENT INDEX
Uprotein
WPI Premium + XHL
Double Choc · Audited product assessment
INDEX SCOREHigh evidence confidence
Why it scored this way
Strong macros and value for performance buyers. Artificial sweeteners and a complex formula make it a weaker clean-label match.
It is not a safety certification, medical recommendation, guarantee of performance or proof that this product is suitable for you. It compares this product only against the published WPI criteria and current comparison group.
View label & evidence detailsManufacturer records, nutrition and evidence notes
Original label information
Manufacturer information reviewed for this assessment.
View current manufacturer sourceWPI Premium + XHL · Double Choc
- Protein declaration
- 87g per 100g
- Ingredients as published
- WPI · hydrolysed WPI · leucine · cocoa · enzymes · anticaking agent · sucralose · Ace-K
- Origin statement
- AU, NZ and/or USA dairy · made in Sydney
- Nutrition panel visibility
- Published online
- Ingredient-list visibility
- Published online
- Origin disclosure visibility
- Multiple possible whey origins stated online
- Record reviewed
- Official product page
- Last reviewed
- 18 August 2026
- Manufacturer source
- uprotein.com.au
Recorded as published. Online information may differ from the current pack. Missing values are not inferred.
Uprotein · Double Choc
- Exact product
- WPI Premium + XHL · Double Choc
- Ingredients
- WPI · hydrolysed WPI · leucine · cocoa · enzymes · anticaking agent · sucralose · Ace-K
- Panel visibility
- Published online
- Evidence reviewed
- Official product page
Manufacturer information—not a new laboratory result.
How evidence labels work
Verified Current, accessible supporting evidence matches the stated claim and reviewed product.
Brand claim — not independently verified A manufacturer statement is available, but supporting independent evidence was not found.
Not disclosed No usable public evidence was found. This is a gap in the record, not proof of poor quality.
Not applicable This evidence field does not apply to the product or claim being assessed.
Conflict — review required Official sources differ, so no value is chosen silently.