CHOCOLATE WPI · RANK 14 OF 44

Uprotein
WPI Premium + XHL

Double Choc · Audited product assessment

72/100
INDEX SCORE
High evidence confidence
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

Why it scored this way

Strong protein concentration and competitive cost supported the performance result. Mixed whey sourcing and a more complex formula reduced other components.

Product quality23/25
Ingredients7/20
Testing evidence15/20
Source origin9/15
Value12/12
Customer experience6/8
What this score does not mean

It is not a safety certification, medical recommendation, guarantee of performance or proof that this product is suitable for you. It compares this product only against the published WPI criteria and current comparison group.

View label & evidence detailsManufacturer records, nutrition and evidence notes
MANUFACTURER INFORMATION

Original label information

Manufacturer information reviewed for this assessment.

View current manufacturer source
LABEL RECORDUprotein

WPI Premium + XHL · Double Choc

Protein declaration
87g per 100g
Ingredients as published
WPI · hydrolysed WPI · leucine · cocoa · enzymes · anticaking agent · sucralose · Ace-K
Origin statement
AU, NZ and/or USA dairy · made in Sydney
Nutrition panel visibility
Published online
Ingredient-list visibility
Published online
Origin disclosure visibility
Multiple possible whey origins stated online
Record reviewed
Official product page
Last reviewed
18 August 2026
Manufacturer source
uprotein.com.au

Recorded as published. Online information may differ from the current pack. Missing values are not inferred.

FLAVOUR-SPECIFIC NUTRITION RECORD

Uprotein · Double Choc

Open manufacturer source
PROTEIN / 100G87gPublished online
Exact product
WPI Premium + XHL · Double Choc
Ingredients
WPI · hydrolysed WPI · leucine · cocoa · enzymes · anticaking agent · sucralose · Ace-K
Panel visibility
Published online
Evidence reviewed
Official product page

Manufacturer information—not a new laboratory result.

How evidence labels work

Verified Current, accessible supporting evidence.

Claimed but could not verify A published statement without accessible independent support.

Not disclosed / unavailable No usable current record was found.

Conflict — review required Official sources differ, so no value is chosen silently.